تحلیل شبکه همکاری های علمی در حوزه طب بازساختی در ایران
الموضوعات : مدیریت دانشعطیه بزرگی پور 1 , سروش قاضی نوری 2 , محمد نقی زاده 3
1 - دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی
2 - دانشگاه علامه
3 - دانشگاه علامه طباطبائی
الکلمات المفتاحية: هم¬, نویسندگی, تحلیل شبکه اجتماعی, طب¬, بازساختی, همکاری علمی,
ملخص المقالة :
هم نویسندگی یکی از شایع ترین مظاهر همکاری علمی بین پژوهشگران و محققان شاخه های علمی می باشد. رشد قابل توجه این پدیده در شاخه های علمی مختلف در دو دهه ی اخیر باعث آن شده تا بررسی ویژگی های مختلف شبکه های هم-نویسندگی به مسأله ای جذاب برای محققان تبدیل گردد. بررسی شبکه های مذکور در شاخه های علمی مختلف از جمله ریاضیات، فیزیک و علوم اطلاع رسانی با استفاده از ابزارهای موجود در حوزه ی تحلیل شبکه های اجتماعی مورد توجه قرار گرفته است. با توجه به رشد روزافزون پدیده ی هم نویسندگی در حوزه های مختلف علوم پزشکی، در این مقاله شبکه ی هم-نویسندگی محققان ایرانی حوزه ی طب بازساختی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفته است. ضمنا شبکه ی همکاری علمی بین موسسات ایرانی فعال در حوزه ی طب بازساختی نیز تحلیل و بررسی گردیده است. در انتها بر مبنای تحلیل های صورت گرفته، پیشنهاداتی جهت ارتقاء سطح کمی و کیفی تحقیقات صورت گرفته آورده شده است.
1. Nikzad, M., H.R. Jamali, and N. Hariri, Patterns of Iranian co-authorship networks in social sciences: A comparative study. Library & Information Science Research, 2011. 33(4): p. 313-319.
2. Wagner, C.S. and L. Leydesdorff. Mapping global science using international co-authorships: a comparison of 1990 and 2000. in Proceedings of ninth international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Beijing. 2003.
3. Wang, Y., et al., Scientific collaboration in China as reflected in co-authorship. Scientometrics, 2005. 62(2): p. 183-198.
4. Faramarz Soheili and Farideh Osareh, A Survey on Density and Size of Co-authorship Networks in Information Science Journals. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2014. 29(2): p. 351-372.
5. Hudson, J., Trends in multi-authored papers in economics. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1996. 10(3): p. 153-158.
6. Abbasi, A., L. Hossain, and L. Leydesdorff, Betweenness centrality as a driver of preferential attachment in the evolution of research collaboration networks. Journal of Informetrics, 2012. 6(3): p. 403-412.
7. Moody, J., The structure of a social science collaboration network: Disciplinary cohesion from 1963 to 1999. American sociological review, 2004. 69(2): p. 213-238.
8. Barabási, A.-L. and R. Albert, Emergence of scaling in random networks. science, 1999. 286(5439): p. 509-512.
9. Barabási, A.-L., et al., Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Physica A: Statistical mechanics and its applications, 2002. 311(3): p. 590-614.
10. Newman, M.E., Clustering and preferential attachment in growing networks. Physical review E, 2001. 64(2): p. 025102.
11. Yousefi-Nooraie, R., et al., Association between co-authorship network and scientific productivity and impact indicators in academic medical research centers: a case study in Iran. Health Research Policy and Systems, 2008. 6(1): p. 9.
12. Kundra, R. and H. Kretschmer, A new model of scientific collaboration part 2. Collaboration patterns in Indian medicine. Scientometrics, 1999. 46(3): p. 519-528.
13. Zare-Farashbandi, F., E. Geraei, and S. Siamaki, Study of co-authorship network of papers in the Journal of Research in Medical Sciences using social network analysis. Journal of Research in Medical Sciences : The Official Journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 2014. 19(1): p. 41-46.
14. Melin, G. and O. Persson, Studying research collaboration using co-authorships. Scientometrics, 1996. 36(3): p. 363-377.
15. Peters, H. and A. Van Raan, Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis: An expercise on a university faculty level. Scientometrics, 1991. 20(1): p. 235-255.
16. Stokes, T.D. and J.A. Hartley, Coauthorship, social structure and influence within specialties. Social Studies of Science, 1989. 19(1): p. 101-125.
17. Glänzel, W. and A. Schubert, Analysing scientific networks through co-authorship. Handbook of quantitative science and technology research, 2004. 11: p. 257-279.
18. Newman, M.E., The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001. 98(2): p. 404-409.
19. Faramarz Soheili, Farideh Osareh, and Abdolhosain Farajpahloo, Social Network Analyses of Information Science Researchers Co-authorship. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2014. 29(1): p. 191-210.
20. Sohieli, F., M. Cheshme Sohrabi, and S. Atashpaykar, Co-authorship network analysis of Iranian medical science researchers: A social network analysis. Caspian Journal of Scientometrics, 2015. 2(1): p. 24-32.
21. Navarro, A. and M. Martín, Scientific production and international collaboration in occupational health, 1992-2001. Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health, 2004: p. 223-233.
22. Mohammadian, S. and E. Vaziri, Analysis and Visualization of Scientific Collaboration of Iran Universities of Medical Sciences Using Social Network Analysis Metrics Based on Web of Science Database. Payavard Salamat, 2017. 11(1): p. 43-56.
23. Heydari, M. and Z. Safavi, The survey of Collaborative Coefficient of article authors in “Journal of Research in Medical Sciences” since 2007 to 2011. Pejouhesh dar Pezeshki (Research in Medicine), 2012. 36(2): p. 109-113.
24. Marefat, R., et al., A survey on collaboration rate of authors in presenting scientific papers in Koomesh journal during 1999-2010. koomesh Journal, 2012. 13(3): p. 279-286.
25. Shekofteh, M. and N. Hariri, Scientific mapping of medicine in Iran using subject category co-citation and social network analysis. Journal of Health Administration, 2013. 16(51): p. 43-59.
26. Mohammadamin Erfanmanesh, R.B.J. Vala Ali Rohani, and Zohreh Gholamhosseinzadeh, Investigating Scientific Collaboration of Iranian Psychology and Psychiatry Researchers. Journal of Information Processing and Management, 2014. 29(1): p. 137-163.
27. Shahrabi Farahani, H., et al., A Study of Scientific Collaboration in Iranian Cardiovascular Articles in Web of Science 2002 – 2011. Journal of Health Administration, 2014. 17(56): p. 46-55.
28. باجی, ف. and ف. عصاره, ساختار شبکة هم نویسندگی حوزة علوم اعصاب ایران با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل شبکة اجتماعی. مطالعات کتابداری و علم اطلاعات, 2015. 21(14، پاییز و زمستان): p. 71-92.
29. حامد, ب., et al., ترسيم شبكه هاي هم تاليفي حوزه طب اورژانس ايران با استفاده از تحليل خوشه اي.
30. Zhao, D. and A. Strotmann, Intellectual structure of stem cell research: a comprehensive author co-citation analysis of a highly collaborative and multidisciplinary field. Scientometrics, 2011. 87(1): p. 115-131.
31. Shvets, A., et al. Detection of current research directions based on full-text clustering. in Science and Information Conference (SAI), 2015. 2015. IEEE.
32. Scott, C.T., et al., Democracy derived? New trajectories in pluripotent stem cell research. Cell, 2011. 145(6): p. 820-826.
33. Gimble, J.M., A.J. Katz, and B.A. Bunnell, Adipose-derived stem cells for regenerative medicine. Circulation research, 2007. 100(9): p. 1249-1260.
34. Miles, M., A. Huberman, and J. Saldana, Qualitative Data Analysis, Vol. 16. European Journal of Science, 1984. 465: p. 427-440.
35. Shibata, N., et al. Detecting emerging research fronts in regenerative medicine by citation network analysis of scientific publications. in Management of Engineering & Technology, 2009. PICMET 2009. Portland International Conference on. 2009. IEEE.
36. Travers, J. and S. Milgram, An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 1969: p. 425-443.
37. Newman, M.E., Coauthorship networks and patterns of scientific collaboration. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 2004. 101(suppl 1): p. 5200-5205.
38. Barabási, A.-L. and E. Bonabeau, Scale-free networks. Scientific american, 2003. 288(5): p. 60-69.
39. Hwang, C.-L. and K. Yoon, Methods for multiple attribute decision making, in Multiple attribute decision making. 1981, Springer. p. 58-191.